Quantcast
Channel: StackExchange Replication Questions
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 17268

High Availability for MariaDB and Postgres : replication or active-passive (SAN) [on hold]

$
0
0

During the last weeks I did a lot of research on High Availability for Postgres and MariaDB. Both by my own research and also recommended by vendor's, I see replication as a better fit nowadays.

Some benefits as using a standby node for backup; scaling; the fact it is simpler (no need for storage replication) and the flexibility...

However; our own DBA's don't like the replication idea. Because they have to maintain 2 instances (non-valid IMO) and our Oracle DBA that mention's replication is only useful in addition to clustering.

But in practices; as failover is faster and each instances uses it's own SAN storage; I see less risk of data loss and down time... Also, multi-site storage has at least some impact on complexity and performance.

What is the opinion of dba stackexchange...?

-- a Linux architect


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 17268

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>