We have sql server 2008 databases in 2 different regions that are p2p replicated.
Now we can see there are some unresolved conflicts - most of them update/delete conflicts. The way our system is designed allows us to safely assume delete commands should be 'winners' against update commands. But most of the delete commands are losers.
So I'm wondering is there any way to make losers(delete commands) as new winners.
I came across this article. There is a way to mark looser as new winner but article applies to merge replication and probably that's the reason I don't see respective buttons to mark losers as new winner for our p2p replication.
So my question is - Is there any way to mark losers as new winners in p2p replication?